<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Meites, Mulder, Mollica &amp; Glink</title>
    <link>http://www.mmmglawblog.com</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:06:56 -0800</pubDate>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title>Turner v. The Saloon, Ltd., No. 07-2449 (7th Cir. Feb. 8, 2010)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Though the Seventh Circuit long ago affirmed under &lt;em&gt;National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan&lt;/em&gt;, 536 U.S. 101 (2002), that evidence of pre-charge harassment is admissible to prove a Title VII hostile-work-environment claim (see &lt;em&gt;West v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Corp&lt;/em&gt;., 405 F.3d 578, 95 FEP 961 (7th Cir. 2005)), it occasionally has to remind the district court judges of this rule, as in this female-on-male harassment case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100208133703.shtml</link>
      <guid>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100208133703.shtml</guid>
      <category>Daily Developments in EEO Law</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:37:03 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dolgaleva v. Virginia Beach City Public Schools, No. 08-1515 (4th Cir. Jan. 29, 2010)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Though the Fourth Circuit ultimately does the right thing in this unpublished opinion, vacating and remanding dismissal of a Title VII national-origin case at the complaint stage, it should throw a scare into plaintiffs&amp;#39;-side lawyers in federal court that a hearing on a&amp;nbsp;Rule 12(b)(6) motion can be the occasion for a mini-trial on the merits.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100129130735.shtml</link>
      <guid>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100129130735.shtml</guid>
      <category>Daily Developments in EEO Law</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:07:35 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lowe v.  Independent School District No. 1, No. 08-6231 (10th Cir. Jan. 25, 2010)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Verdana"&gt;In a decision recalling last year&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;Ekstrand v. School Dist. of Somerset&lt;/em&gt;, 583 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2009), the Tenth Circuit (in an unpublished opinion) reverses summary judgment and remands an ADA&amp;nbsp;reasonable accommodation and constructive discharge case involving a school teacher who sought but did not receive a suitable classroom.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100125163140.shtml</link>
      <guid>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100125163140.shtml</guid>
      <category>Daily Developments in EEO Law</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:31:40 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, L.L.C., No. 08-3860 (8th Cir. Jan. 21, 2010)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Eighth Circuit joins other U.S. Courts of Appeals that have ruled on claims that an employer violated Title VII by imposing a sex-stereotyped stigma on a protected employee -- here, taking away a front-desk clerk&amp;#39;s daytime hours because she supposedly dressed like Ellen DeGeneres and lacked the &amp;quot;Midwestern girl look.&amp;quot; Summary judgment is reversed, on a 2-1 vote,&amp;nbsp;and the case is remanded for trial.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100121111010.shtml</link>
      <guid>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100121111010.shtml</guid>
      <category>Daily Developments in EEO Law</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:10:10 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., No. 07-10270 (11th Cir. Jan. 20, 2010)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A big win for harassment victims is issued today in the Eleventh Circuit, unanimously vacating summary judgment and returning for trial a Title VII claim that generalized hostility to women (such as raunchy talk and pornography in the workplace) may create a hostile work environment, even if not specifically targeted at a particular woman employee.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100120114109.shtml</link>
      <guid>http://www.mmmglawblog.com/tp-080318191354/post-100120114109.shtml</guid>
      <category>Daily Developments in EEO Law</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:41:09 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

